Answer Me: 1997 (The Review)

answerme1997 photo Reply-1997-1_zps1695a295.jpgAnswer Me 1997
(aka: Reply 1997)
air date: 7.24.2012 through 9.18.2012
number of eps: 16 (There’s 14 roughly 30 min episodes, with the final two stretched out to the full hour. So it’s actually shorter than what you’d expect from a 16 episode drama.)
I watched it: An incredibly disciplined marathon that did not involve staying up all night even though I really, really wanted to!! (Kind of proud of myself for that.) Then a re-watch with the husband.

In a nutshell: An explosion of nostalgia-laced awesomeness. We’re introduced to a group of friends at their 2012 class reunion and then flashback to their high-school days in 1997 (just like the title of this cartoon!) when they began the painful and hilarious (and sometimes painfully hilarious) transition from childhood to adulthood. Which actually nutshells the clever way the story is told. Instead of using over the top plot-twists to keep the story interesting, the drama uses the then-and-now tension to keep us interested in how these characters became who they are today compared to who they were as kids. So the narrative is the fresh-and-new inviting us to enjoy a plot that was, in many ways, as nostalgic as the setting.

But wait! There’s more: The characters are so well realized — written and acted — that I almost feel like even without the interesting story-telling methods, I would have loved this drama. I cared for each character and wanted them all to successfully navigate the emotional pitfalls of teenage life and find fulfillment. And then there are the adults. I loved them as well. Sung Shi-won’s parents, for example, were so quirky and cool and parental that I actually enjoyed getting flashbacks to their past or episodes where their story took center-stage — which isn’t always the case. This well-roundedness was especially cool with a character who could have easily slid into a “sassy-gay friend” role. (I won’t name him, because the reveal was too good to spoil.) But the depth he was given kept that from happening. He had the same kind of epic-crushes the other characters had and it was treated just as tenderly (humor and pain shaping him into the man he became) as it was with the other characters.

Even better if…: If I’d had anything like a normal high school experience, or if I was more familiar with the soundtrack and pop-culture of that era in S. Korea, I can only imagine how much more awesome Answer Me 1997 would have been. Visual and audio clues tipping me back into a different time when I was going through similar growing-pains… It’s no wonder this was such a runaway hit. But even without the cultural cues, I had plenty of moments when I remembered exactly what it felt like to feel that passionately and to have the future feel that wide open. Definitely a must-watch.


10 thoughts on “Answer Me: 1997 (The Review)

  1. Yes, I agree it would’ve been an even more enjoyable watch if my growing up years had been similar, or if I’d grown up in Korea! Still, an excellent show, & I thought Seo In Guk & Jung Eun Ji were AMAZING. ❤

    • I loved how they included all these easter-eggs for people who would get them, but at the same time didn’t rely on them to create that sense of nostalgia. A good example of well layered story-telling. (And for a comedy, too! Which sometimes isn’t treated as carefully — though it should be.)

      And yes, those two were incredible. This was a debut for both of them, right? You wouldn’t know it. There was nothing stiff or studied about them — they just were their characters. I can’t wait to see them in other things. (Which means I’m going to be signing up for another melo a little sooner than I’d expected…)

      • Seo In Guk actually acted in Love Rain before he did AM1997. Completely different character. I was floored to realize it was the same guy!

        I’m planning to check out Rascal Sons just for Seo In Guk. & I’m waiting to hear about Winter, coz I’m not interested in the premise but Kim Bum looks hawt & Jung Eun Ji looks adorable! 😉

        • Really? Hmm… Love Rain just got a little more interesting to me… 😉

          I’m so nervous about Winter. Mainly because I’m not sure I’m in the mood for another melo, so we’ll see if I stick with it or let it go until it’s done and I can hear other people’s reactions.

  2. Definitely one of the highlights of last year. It was actually funny how it was able to transport even me back to my teen years and those were waaaaayyyyy back in the dark ages. *g*

  3. I love the then/now sort of tension, so you’ve helped me decide whether I should star with this or with “School 2013”. You have a wonderful way with words. 🙂

    • Yay, thank you! 🙂 “School 2013” is good — but in my humble, I’d say “Answer Me 1997” is a more complete package. Let me know what you think when you’ve viewed it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s